Then I’ll get to the ‘why’ of what will and won’t work. Probably a bit long as I am adding in parts of the foundation for debate I found missing from the in-world conversation. I found the discussion particularly annoying. I find, surprisingly, some of those at the meeting are also way uninformed or misinformed about the law, content protection measures, and certainly philosophy and ethics. He asks a reasonable but surprisingly uninformed question. His rez-day is in 2005, older than me… and his avatar didn’t even creak or anything… ( web) Obviously he is in content sales and has a vested interest in the subject. “What is being done about the increase in marketplace copybot accounts, the reasoning behind not banning on the first offense, the reasoning behind not IP banning and the reasoning behind not taking the money back to Linden Lab?īrooke is the Coordinator & PR for Powder Pack, per his profile.
The subject of content theft came up when Brooke Barmy asked the question, It then contuse for another 45+ minutes after the meeting. This video is from the last few minutes of Content Creation UG meeting of June 27, 2017. (60+ minutes) There are time marks for the various topics in the index below (last page) if you want to find just the juicy parts.
Still, the resident thief really annoyed me. It was a surprisingly calm and somewhat intelligent conversation. The issue of content theft, copyboting, is one of them.Īt the last Content Creation UG meeting the subject of content theft, what the Lab does about it, and what CAN be done about it came up. There are hot issues in SL that carry loads of emotional energy.
#SECOND LIFE COPYBOT ENFER SOMBRE DOWNLOAD#
A person can use them to download ANYTHING… ANYTHING in Second Life. The residual effects have yet to be seen, due to some organizing a boycott of buying and selling in Second Life due to Linden Lab's response of CopyBot, as well as some items being effectively leaked to freebie form.In case there is ANYONE in Second Life™ that doesn’t know what Copybot Viewers are, they are viewers made from the open source viewers, Linden and third-party, that have been altered to ignore Permissions.
#SECOND LIFE COPYBOT ENFER SOMBRE CODE#
In addition, LibSL had experienced a complete restructuring of command, with several people moving to only programmer status, as well as moving of the source code to a site which allows tigher control of distribution. Also, it has disbanded a member who was seen to be discussing the more nefarious uses of the bot. In response to the leak of CopyBot, LibSL has now restricted access to its developer code. Others criticized Linden Lab for their support of LibSL. LibSL had received severe criticism from residents for the lack of ethics some of the developers had, as well as lack of control they had over their source code. In reaction to the leak of a potentially devastating tool, several shops closed doors in protest. On November 14, 2006, CopyBot was leaked to the public without LibSL's approval. It did not have the ability to copy the contents of objects, including any scripts that may have been used. Under its more famous features, it had the ability to copy the prims it sees on someone's avatar, or an individual free-standing object. CopyBot is a project by Libsecondlife in an effort to provide a tool for the end user to back up and download/upload one's own creations.
0 kommentar(er)
